
Alright, so we've got our two bettors, we've seen survival rate, but there is more to it than survival rate. Of the survivors, who is the winner, also, is there a point at which a bettor should stop as their odds significantly decrease after a certain point?
Take our doubler bettor for example. Should this doubler bettor actually reach 10x his initial investment, how wise is it that he continues? We are certain that, on a long enough timeline, this doubler will lose everything, so at what point might we be content at our lottery winnings?
Many questions, but first, let's just compare our bettors!
Since we will be comparing bettors, and eventually maybe have a handful, it would be wise to just set the starting funds, wager size, and wager count ahead of time globally.
import random
import matplotlib
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import time
sampleSize = 100
startingFunds = 10000
wagerSize = 100
wagerCount = 1000
def rollDice():
roll = random.randint(1,100)
if roll == 100:
return False
elif roll <= 50:
return False
elif 100 > roll >= 50:
return True
def doubler_bettor(funds,initial_wager,wager_count):
value = funds
wager = initial_wager
wX = []
vY = []
currentWager = 1
previousWager = 'win'
previousWagerAmount = initial_wager
while currentWager <= wager_count:
if previousWager == 'win':
if rollDice():
value += wager
wX.append(currentWager)
vY.append(value)
else:
value -= wager
previousWager = 'loss'
previousWagerAmount = wager
wX.append(currentWager)
vY.append(value)
if value < 0:
currentWager += 10000000000000000
elif previousWager == 'loss':
if rollDice():
wager = previousWagerAmount * 2
value += wager
wager = initial_wager
previousWager = 'win'
wX.append(currentWager)
vY.append(value)
else:
wager = previousWagerAmount * 2
value -= wager
previousWager = 'loss'
previousWagerAmount = wager
wX.append(currentWager)
vY.append(value)
if value < 0:
currentWager += 10000000000000000
currentWager += 1
# this guy goes cyan #
plt.plot(wX,vY,'c')
##### color#
def simple_bettor(funds,initial_wager,wager_count,color):
####
value = funds
wager = initial_wager
wX = []
vY = []
currentWager = 1
while currentWager <= wager_count:
if rollDice():
value += wager
wX.append(currentWager)
vY.append(value)
else:
value -= wager
wX.append(currentWager)
vY.append(value)
###add me
if value < 0:
currentWager += 10000000000000000
currentWager += 1
# this guy goes green #
plt.plot(wX,vY,color)
x = 0
while x < sampleSize:
simple_bettor(startingFunds,wagerSize,wagerCount,'k')
simple_bettor(startingFunds,wagerSize*2,wagerCount,'c')
#doubler_bettor(startingFunds,wagerSize,wagerCount)
x+=1
plt.axhline(0, color = 'r')
plt.ylabel('Account Value')
plt.xlabel('Wager Count')
plt.show()
Initially, with 1,000 wagers, it looks fairly comparable.

Let's look at 10,000 wagers next:

On a longer term, our doubler better is clearly dying out. Is it because it is an inferior strategy? Not really. The doubler bettor is just a doubler, and they are increasing the pace by doubling their bets. Thus, they are speeding up the process. That's really all doubling will do for you.